Prepares moderation meeting materials including sample scripts, standardisation activities, and recording templates.
Compares class results against benchmarks with contextualised analysis that accounts for cohort factors.
Designs an assessment system that tracks meaningful progress without relying on levels or flight paths.
Generates a bank of subject-specific report comment components covering strengths, development, and targets.
Plans a daily report writing schedule with targets per session that keeps everything within working hours.
Analyses exam results to identify question-level patterns and priority actions for improving outcomes.
Writes a detailed question-by-question analysis distinguishing knowledge gaps from technique errors.
Creates a short diagnostic quiz that identifies prerequisite gaps before you start teaching a new topic.
Identifies which students need intervention, what kind, and by when — based on transparent criteria.
Writes high-quality multiple choice questions with distractors based on real student misconceptions.
Drafts a professional, neutral response to a formal grade appeal with clear process explanation.
Writes clear mark schemes for extended writing with level descriptors and borderline decision guidance.
Reviews your assessment policy against workload, reliability, and student benefit criteria with practical recommendations.
Creates a student-friendly explanation of grade boundaries showing what each grade looks like in practice.
Designs a start-of-year baseline assessment that identifies starting points without demoralising students.
Spaces assessment dates across a term to prevent clustering and give time for meaningful feedback.
Writes qualitative progress narratives that combine data with professional observation for reports or meetings.
Sets up a comparative judgment exercise with instructions, pairing strategy, and results conversion.
Writes an interactive live marking script that models assessment thinking for the whole class.
Designs a 30-second verbal feedback recording system with stamp wording and student follow-up prompts.
Generates 15 forward-looking prompts that direct students to specific next steps, not past mistakes.
Designs a Dedicated Improvement and Reflection Time activity with structured tasks linked to feedback themes.
Creates a portfolio assessment framework that values process and progress, not just final products.
Builds a transparent predicted grade method that accounts for trajectory, not just current performance.
Breaks a set of mock exams into a realistic marking schedule with daily targets that protect evenings and weekends.
Creates a structured framework that guides students through giving specific, constructive feedback to each other.
Builds concrete, checkable self-assessment criteria students complete before submitting work.
Generates 10 exit ticket questions that reveal understanding, misconceptions, or confidence in under two minutes.
Create a reusable bank of feedback comments so you stop rewriting the same responses.
Reduce individual marking by delivering high-impact feedback to the whole class.
Get marking done efficiently when time is limited.
Help students improve their work without rewriting it for them.